Why the study?
Does a simplified cardiopulmonary bypass technique allow for safe surgical treatment in patients with renal tumors with intracaval and intracardiac extensions?
Does a simplified cardiopulmonary bypass technique allow for safe surgical treatment in patients with renal tumors with intracaval and intracardiac extensions?
A simplified cardiopulmonary bypass technique without circulatory arrest appears to be a safe and feasible approach for removing renal tumors with intracaval and intracardiac extensions.
May support simplified CPB without arrest in select cases; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
The authors report four cases of renal tumors with intracaval and intracardiac extensions that can be removed successfully during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. The management was relatively simple: mild hypothermia, empty heartbeat, monocaval cannulation, and no circulatory arrest. Bleeding from the hepatic or renal veins was controlled by temporary occlusion of the hepatic artery, the portal vein, and the renal artery for a short duration. The authors also advocate thrombectomy of the hepatic vein using direct observation to relieve hepatic congestion. No complications were experienced postoperatively. One patient died of systemic metastasis 9 months after the operation. Another died of cytomegalovirus infection 3 months postoperatively. The remaining 2 are leading normal lives. Although the surgical indication for these advanced tumors is controversial, the patients' quality of life may be improved by this aggressive yet simple and safe approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oba et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: