Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Electroencephalography (EEG)-based depression classification requires interpretable machine-learning approaches and validation strategies that avoid subject-level information leakage. This single-center pilot study developed and internally evaluated a marker-based interpretable machine-learning framework using eight-channel resting-state EEG. After quality control, 48 participants were included, comprising 23 clinician-diagnosed major depressive disorder (MDD) patients recruited at Zhejiang Provincial Tongde Hospital and 25 healthy controls (HCs). Subject-level spectral, entropy/complexity, asymmetry, and coherence-based connectivity features were extracted from pre-processed EEG epochs. Exploratory feature analysis was used to define a three-component EEG marker comprising fronto-posterior beta- and gamma-band coherence heterogeneity and F8-F7 beta-band asymmetry variability. The resulting marker was evaluated using classical classifiers under strict subject-wise leave-one-subject-out validation and compared with EEGNet and 1D-CNN baselines under the same subject-wise protocol. Among the evaluated classical models, RBF-SVM achieved the highest subject-level discrimination in the primary native-reference 2-s analysis, with an AUC of 0.910, accuracy of 85.42%, sensitivity of 82.61%, and specificity of 88.00%. The primary result used the native A1/A2 acquisition reference and non-overlapping 2-s epochs, consistent with segmentation used in previous resting-state EEG depression studies. SHAP analysis indicated that fronto-posterior gamma-band coherence heterogeneity and F8-F7 beta-band asymmetry variability were the dominant contributors to the RBF-SVM decision function. These findings support the exploratory value of compact EEG markers for interpretable internal discrimination in data-limited eight-channel settings and motivate validation in independent external cohorts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: