Two of the main performance criteria of a water distribution system are that it is inexpensive to construct, operate, and maintain and that it operates in a reliable manner. These two criteria are often conflicting, thus implying that the decision maker needs to reach a compromise in scheduling mains for replacement. One way to facilitate this decision is to generate a trade-off surface that represents the compromise between the two objectives. This paper demonstrates the use of genetic algorithms to generate trade-off curves between cost and reliability for pipe replacement decisions. Curves for two planning scenarios are generated. The first identifies the trade-offs necessary for the current conditions. The second allows the water authority to determine the required levels of future expenditure, given funding constraints, to meet a specified level of service over the entire planning horizon. Alternatively, it provides an estimate of the impact on performance of delaying expenditure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dandy et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: