Quasi-experimental study demonstrates improved pelvic examination scores with iteratively enhanced simulation training in medical clerkship students, highlighting instructional design benefits.
Objectives To evaluate whether an Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation (ADDIE)-guided, iteratively refined pelvic examination curriculum improves directly observed procedural performance in clerkship students. Methods A single-center quasi-experimental study was conducted with three cohorts (total n=86) to compare training approaches. Cohort 1 received a conventional simulation package (n=20); cohort 2 received an enhanced package supplemented with micro-courses and flashcards (n=20); and cohort 3 received a comprehensive package that additionally incorporated scenario simulation (n=46). The primary outcome was assessed using a 12-item formative checklist, scored from 0 to 100. Between-cohort differences were evaluated using the Kruskal–Wallis test, and the effect size was reported as epsilon-squared ( ε 2 ). To account for potential confounding, an ordinary least squares (OLS) regression model was fitted, with adjustment for gender, age, and baseline self-rated skill; heteroskedasticity-consistent (HC3) robust standard errors (SEs) were used, and two-sided Wald tests were applied for inference. Results Significant differences in total scores were found across cohorts ( H =49.76, p<0.001; ε 2 =0.575), with scores observed to increase progressively from cohort 1 (59.05 ± 14.78) to cohort 2 (92.80 ± 6.35) and cohort 3 (96.76 ± 3.37). After adjustment for covariates, both enhanced training approaches were found to be associated with substantially higher scores relative to conventional training (cohort 2 vs. cohort 1: β =35.03, 95 % confidence interval [ CI ]: 27.54–42.51, p<0.001; cohort 3 vs. cohort 1: β =38.92, 95 % CI : 31.75–46.08, p<0.001). Female gender was independently associated with higher scores ( β =5.47, 95 % CI : 1.98–8.95; p=0.002). Progressive improvement in self-rated skill was also observed across cohorts, with mean increases of 2.35, 2.80, and 3.17 points recorded, respectively. Conclusions ADDIE-guided iterative optimization was associated with large gains in observed pelvic examination performance. The largest increment followed integration of micro-courses and flashcards.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: