The model presented overcomes past inconsistencies by applying asymptotic techniques. The obtained growth rate, γ≈α(k)√kg-2kνₐ (where νₐ=ablation velocity, α(k)≡√1-(kkc)ʳ represents the stabilization heat conduction effect, and the cutoff wave number kc is much smaller than the inverse of the density scale length at the ablation front), reproduces numerical simulations and experiments in a more complete way than the so-called Takabe formula, γ=0.9√kg-3kνₐ.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J. Sanz (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: