This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The aim of this study was to validate the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale in three different groups: adults with multiple sclerosis ( n = 65), fibromyalgia ( n = 64), and healthy adults ( n = 86). Participants completed the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale and other self-report measures. While findings supported the internal consistency of the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale (all Cronbach’s alpha ⩾ 0.85), standard error of measurement estimates were larger than hypothesized. In addition, while item-level reliability was generally supported, item-total correlations for two items were lower than expected. Convergent and discriminant validity were supported, and the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale was able to distinguish between individuals with and without chronic disease. Overall, the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale exhibited acceptable psychometric properties.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carlozzi et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: