Perinatal mental health has become the focus for policymakers, government, research, the acute health sector, and health practitioners. The aim of this clinical data-mining study (Epstein, 2010 Epstein, I. 2010. Clinical Data-Mining: Integrating Practice and Research, New York, NY: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]) was to undertake a retrospective exploration into the primary mental health and psychosocial issues experienced by women who were pregnant and accessing obstetric care at one of the largest maternity hospitals in Australia. The study also investigated service pathways and gaps. Aboriginal women were overrepresented, demonstrating their ongoing disadvantage, whereas other linguistically and culturally diverse women were underrepresented, suggesting the existence of barriers to service. Although psychosocial factors tend to be underreported (Buist et al., 2002 Buist, A.E., Barnett, B.E., Milgrom, J., Pope, S., Condon, J.T., Ellwood, D. and Hayes, B.A. 2002. To screen or not to screen – That is the question in perinatal depression. Medical Journal of Australia, 177(Suppl S): 101–105. [Google Scholar]), the findings highlighted the integral rather than peripheral nature of these factors during pregnancy (Vilder, 2006 Vilder, C.H. 2006. Improving treatment outcomes for depressed women: Use of self help inventory in counselling settings. Psychotherapy Australia, 12(2): 74–81. [Google Scholar]) and suggest the need for change to systems that work to support women's perinatal mental health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Makregiorgos et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: