Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Designs of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) main magnets obtained from both a functional method and a genetic algorithm method have been compared. While most features in the two approaches are similar, there are several important differences. The functional method leads to fewer coil bundles and a reduced total current, i.e., total ampere turns, (e.g., 6-8 MA) that can be as much as 70% of the total current found with the genetic analysis. While the conclusion about stress is that it is a sensitive function of the choice of wire current density, the designs found with the functional method have a larger hoop stress than that of the genetic design, which may require new or refined manufacturing techniques. Furthermore, the functional approach requires much less computing power (i.e., a personal computer is quite sufficient) while the genetic algorithm method in general demands massively parallel computing techniques. However, in order to search for the optimal magnetic resonance design at a given field strength, it is likely that a combination of these two methods will lead to the best results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheng et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: