Key result
Interviews with 58 specialist doctors and nurses revealed they act as 'promotors not prescribers' of exercise, citing safety concerns and fragmented referral pathways for cardiometabolic patients.
Why the study?
Exercise is a frontline therapy for chronic cardiometabolic disease, but traditional tertiary health care service models lack exercise physiology.
Observational (n=58)
Despite universal acceptance of exercise benefits, specialist doctors and nurses face significant barriers to prescribing exercise, highlighting a need to integrate exercise professionals into tertiary care models.
Reveals exercise care gaps in specialist settings; leaves open optimal integration models for exercise professionals in cardiometabolic services.
ObjectivesExercise is a frontline therapy for the management of chronic cardiometabolic disease, however traditional tertiary health care service models do not include exercise physiology. We aimed to explore professional roles, practices, and services regarding exercise care in chronic cardiometabolic disease from the perspectives of specialist doctors and nurses.MethodsUsing a qualitative description design, semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with 32 doctors and 26 nurses involved in the care of relevant patients with liver, kidney, or cardiac disease, or diabetes, across hospital and community settings in a Queensland metropolitan health service. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis.ResultsFour overarching themes were identified. Despite universal acceptance of the multifactorial benefits of exercise, there was a lack of confidence in patients' capabilities to exercise and safety concerns due to complex comorbidities. Interviewees considered themselves 'promotors not prescribers' of exercise. There was no structured exercise history taken outside of cardiac rehabilitation units with significant variability in advice provided. Access to exercise specialist services was limited and disease-specific, with inconsistent and fragmented referral pathways. General Practitioners were considered responsible for facilitating exercise specialist involvement in ongoing care, with onus placed on patients to initiate.ConclusionsThere is an evidence-practice gap between the established benefits of exercise for chronic disease management and access to exercise professionals and services, resources, and knowledge. This deprioritises exercise as a frontline therapy with patient care implications. This study identified a need to transform the way that exercise care is accessed and delivered in tertiary settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Keating et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Chronic cardiometabolic disease (n=58). Exercise prescription and care practices was evaluated on Professional roles, practices, and services regarding exercise care. Interviews with 58 specialist doctors and nurses revealed they act as 'promotors not prescribers' of exercise, citing safety concerns and fragmented referral pathways for cardiometabolic patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: