Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Attempts to study the core-mantle boundary have traditionally been frustrated by the large scattered amplitude ratios of PcP to P phases. An analysis of these phases at the Large-Aperture Seismic Array (Lasa) shows that two sources of severe scattering are the crust and upper mantle structure under the receiver and the low-velocity zone near the source. Measured amplitudes at the 21 Lasa subarray sites show that P and PcP amplitude patterns from the same event are generally uncorrelated. As a result, PcP/P amplitude ratios have large standard deviations across Lasa, typically 50% of the mean PcP/P ratios. However, P patterns for two events several degrees apart are highly correlated, as are PcP patterns. Thus amplitude fluctuations across Lasa are caused by near-receiver scattering rather than deep mantle or core structure. Steered beams were formed of P and PcP phases for 35 events in the distance range 40°–84° with depths from 0 to 609 km. The PcP/P ratios obtained from these beams show a clear trend from ∼0.4 at a depth of 0 km for explosion data to ∼0.15 at depths greater than 200 km for all distances. This depth effect cannot be explained by laterally homogeneous low-Q models of the upper mantle. When the events are normalized to Lasa mb = 6.0, the resulting PcP amplitudes show no clear depth dependence. It is thus suggested that variations in P amplitude cause most of the scatter in PcP/P ratios obtained from beamed data. A horizontally laminated low-velocity zone consisting of alternating hard and soft layers could produce the observed variation of PcP/P amplitude ratios with depth, although other scattering mechanisms cannot be eliminated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frasier et al. (1974) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: