Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Determining factors associated with negative slope of inverse creatinine vs. time (1/Cr vs. t) may help prevent a decline in renal allograft function. METHODS: A total of 1389 adult recipients of primary renal transplants were divided into quartiles based on the slope of 1/Cr vs. t calculated from 6 and 12 months post transplant. A multivariate analysis of risk factors for being in the worst vs. best quartile employed these variables: donor source, HLA mismatch, recipient age, donor age, panel-reactive antibody (PRA), acute rejection (AR), 3-month cyclosporin A (CsA) level, 1-yr CsA level and acute tubular necrosis. Two separate analyses compared risk factors in patients with 1 and 3 yr survival, respectively. RESULTS: In recipients with > or = 1 yr graft survival, high PRA and AR were associated with negative slopes of 1/Cr vs. t. For those with > or = 3 yr graft survival, both AR and 3-month CsA level > 150 ng/mL were significant risk factors, using both 6- and 12-month slopes. Stratification of AR showed 1 AR episode > or = 6 months and multiple AR episodes carried significant risk for negative slopes. CONCLUSION: Optimization of allograft function invokes a conundrum between the needs to avoid both AR and high early CsA levels. We support a policy of carefully balancing these two risks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paraskevas et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: