Key result
Endovascular coil embolization in patients aged 80 years or older with aSAH resulted in a 50% inhospital mortality rate, but 88% of survivors had a good functional outcome at 6 months.
Why the study?
Does endovascular coil embolization improve functional outcome in patients aged 80 years or older with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage?
Observational (n=16)
Does endovascular coil embolization improve functional outcome in patients aged 80 years or older with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage?
While very elderly patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage have high inhospital mortality, survivors treated with coil embolization have a robust chance of good functional recovery.
High mortality warrants careful patient selection for coil embolization in octogenarians with aSAH; leaves open need for comparative data on outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: As the population ages, clinicians will be faced with difficult decisions regarding treatment of elderly patients presenting with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Previous data have led to continued pessimism by some clinicians treating elderly and very elderly patients presenting with aSAH. The aim of this study was to present our experience in the very elderly treated with endovascular coiling after presentation with aSAH. METHODS: Retrospective review of all patients 80 years of age or older presenting with aSAH who underwent coil embolization. Primary outcomes of interest were functional outcome, as assessed by the Glasgow Outcome Scale score, and inhospital mortality. RESULTS: During the study period, 16 patients aged 80 years or older presenting with aSAH underwent coil embolization; nine (56%) had a poor outcome at the 6 month follow-up while seven (44%) had a good outcome. The inhospital mortality rate was 50%. Of those patients alive at discharge, seven out of eight (88%) patients had a good outcome. Variables associated with poor outcome included higher Hunt and Hess score (p=0.010), use of balloon assistance/remodeling (p=0.025), and presence of coronary artery disease (p=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Not surprisingly, we found that very elderly patients presenting with aSAH have a high inhospital mortality rate. However, those patients who survive to discharge have a surprisingly robust chance at good functional recovery when treated with coil embolization. We believe these results support offering endovascular coil embolization, when feasible, to very elderly patients presenting with aSAH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wilson et al. (2013) conducted an observational in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) (n=16). Endovascular coil embolization was evaluated on functional outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale score) and inhospital mortality. Endovascular coil embolization in patients aged 80 years or older with aSAH resulted in a 50% inhospital mortality rate, but 88% of survivors had a good functional outcome at 6 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: