Key result
The positive relationship between heart rate and negative affect was significant only at high levels of perceived control over work or academic stressors (interaction expB 1.03, p<0.001).
Why the study?
There is a general paucity of work employing ambulatory assessments of physiological responses to daily life, limiting understanding of connections between stress, perceived control, affect, and physiology.
Does perceived control moderate the relationship between heart rate and negative affect in young adults experiencing daily stressors?
Observational (n=22)
No
Does perceived control moderate the relationship between heart rate and negative affect in young adults experiencing daily stressors?
Integrating ambulatory physiological data and ecological momentary assessment reveals that perceived control moderates the relationship between heart rate and negative affect during daily stressors.
Perceived control may strengthen heart rate-negative affect links during uncontrollable daily stressors; leaves open whether targeting control improves real-world wellbeing.
The current study sought to advance our understanding of the connections between stress, perceived control, affect, and physiology in daily life. To achieve this goal, we integrated hourly ambulatory physiological and experiential data from young adult participants who experienced work or academic stressors over the course of a day. Participants wore a cardiovascular monitor that recorded heart rate data continuously for 8 h while hourly random Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) data were collected in personally relevant settings via mobile phones to learn about stress, perceived control, and affect. The current findings provide a critical advance by demonstrating clear evidence for moderation by perceived control, wherein affective wellbeing was strongly associated with heart rate when one experienced a stressor outside their control. The innovative approach utilized in the current study in real-world settings provides further support for the value of integrating individuals' self-report and physiological experiences (e.g., the role of perceived control), as the information gained can provide critical insights into stress physiology (e.g., heart rate) and wellbeing (e.g., negative affect) connections. The present study thus provides a critical advance to the literature by connecting the literature on daily affect, perceived control, and physiological data streams. This innovation is particularly noteworthy given the general paucity of work that employs ambulatory assessments of physiological responses to daily life.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lohani et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Daily work or academic stress (n=22). Heart rate and perceived control over stressors was evaluated on Hourly negative affect (expB 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.04, p=<0.001). The positive relationship between heart rate and negative affect was significant only at high levels of perceived control over work or academic stressors (interaction expB 1.03, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: