Key result
A 7-day sampling scheme combining ecological momentary assessment with continuous ECG monitoring was feasible, achieving a 72.0% survey response rate and capturing wide variations in stress reactivity.
Why the study?
Laboratory stressors cannot capture the variety, severity, or duration of daily stressors, prompting evaluation of ecological momentary assessment with wireless ECG monitoring to measure stress reactivity in natural settings.
Does combining ecological momentary assessment and continuous heart rate monitoring feasibly measure stress reactivity in natural settings in adult women?
Observational (n=35)
No
Does combining ecological momentary assessment and continuous heart rate monitoring feasibly measure stress reactivity in natural settings in adult women?
Combining ecological momentary assessment with continuous ECG monitoring over 7 days is a feasible method to measure autonomic stress reactivity in natural settings.
May enable ambulatory stress reactivity assessment in women; leaves open validation in larger cohorts and linkage to outcomes.
The way people respond to stressful situations (i.e., stress reactivity) varies widely. Researchers typically measure stress reactivity in controlled studies, but this is limited because laboratory stressors cannot capture the variety, severity, or duration of stressors that individuals face in their daily lives. The present study examined the feasibility of using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) and a wireless electrocardiography (ECG) patch to develop an understanding of stress reactivity in natural settings. Thirty-five adult women completed EMA surveys about stressors they were exposed to while wearing a wireless ECG monitor for 7 consecutive days. Daily stressors were measured using seven questions adapted from the Daily Inventory of Stressful Events and a stressor interval was defined as the presence of at least one stressor during the EMA survey prompt. Participants wore the Cardea SOLO wireless ECG monitor (Cardiac Insight Inc., Bellevue, WA) to continuously track their heart rate. Participant-specific differences in 5-minute heart rate variability (HRV) between intervals when participants did and did not report stressors were calculated and displayed in a heat map. Survey response rate was satisfactory (72.0%, n = 588) and nearly all participants (33 out of 35) reported both stressor and non-stressor intervals. Each participant reported at least one stressor on approximately 35% of completed surveys while wearing the ECG patch. Mean wear time (6.6 days) and the duration of analyzable data with an ECG monitor were close to the 7-day study period. While many participants had lower HRV during stressor versus non-stressor intervals, the magnitude and direction of these differences varied widely. In summary, we found that a 7-day sampling scheme combining ecological momentary assessment (EMA) with HRV measured using continuous ECG monitoring was feasible and effective in capturing a variety of daily stressors and measuring autonomic stress reactivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Stress reactivity (n=35). Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) and continuous ECG monitoring was evaluated on Feasibility (survey response rate and wear time). A 7-day sampling scheme combining ecological momentary assessment with continuous ECG monitoring was feasible, achieving a 72.0% survey response rate and capturing wide variations in stress reactivity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: