Key result
Epidural analgesia during labour did not significantly increase the incidence of new long-term backache compared to non-epidural analgesia (29% vs 28%).
Why the study?
Does epidural analgesia during labour increase long-term backache in primigravidas?
RCT (n=200)
Randomized
No
Does epidural analgesia during labour increase long-term backache in primigravidas?
Absolute Event Rate: 29% vs 28%
p-value: p=0.9
Epidural analgesia during labour does not significantly increase the incidence of long-term backache compared to non-epidural analgesia.
Supports epidural use without backache concerns; confirms safety in this RCT.
Objective: To find out the association of epidural analgesia duringlabour with long termbackache. Design: A randomized controlled trial. Setting: Combined Military Hospital Rawalpindi.Period: March 2002 to Feb 2003. Material and Methods: 100 randomized to epidural group and 100 randomized tonon-epidural group. In the follow up study 92 women were from the epidural group and 89 from the non-epidural group.Results: There were no significant differences between groups in demographic details or other key characteristics.There were no significant differences in the onset or duration of low back pain. There were no differences in selfreported measures of disability in activities of daily living and no significant differences in measurements of spinalmobility. Conclusions: The incidence of new long term backache was not significantly increased in women whoreceived epidural analgesia in labour. Motor block resulting from epidural local anaesthetic administration was not asignificant factor in the development of backache.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Farooq Ahmad (2007) conducted an RCT in Labour (n=200). Epidural analgesia vs. Non-epidural analgesia (Nalbuphine) was evaluated on Incidence of new backache at 6 months postpartum (p=0.9). Epidural analgesia during labour did not significantly increase the incidence of new long-term backache compared to non-epidural analgesia (29% vs 28%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: