Key result
Adjunctive catheter-directed thrombolysis during primary PCI for STEMI with high thrombus burden showed no significant difference in bleeding complications (9.8% vs. 7.2%, p=0.53) compared to no CDT.
Why the study?
High coronary thrombus burden is associated with unfavorable outcomes in STEMI, but its optimal management has not yet been established.
Does adjunctive catheter-directed thrombolysis improve coronary flow and safety in STEMI patients with high thrombus burden undergoing primary PCI?
Cohort (n=263)
Does adjunctive catheter-directed thrombolysis improve coronary flow and safety in STEMI patients with high thrombus burden undergoing primary PCI?
Absolute Event Rate: 9.8% vs 7.2%
p-value: p=0.53
Adjunctive catheter-directed thrombolysis during primary PCI for STEMI with high thrombus burden appears safe and effective for improving coronary flow, particularly after unsatisfactory aspiration thrombectomy.
Supports safety of adjunctive CDT in high-thrombus STEMI; hypothesis-generating for flow benefits pending RCTs.
Background: High coronary thrombus burden has been associated with unfavorable outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), the optimal management of which has not yet to be established. Methods: We evaluated the safety and efficacy of adjunctive catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with STEMI and high thrombus burden. Results: Among the 1,849 consecutive patients with STEMI, 263 had high thrombus burden. Moreover, 41 patients received intracoronary infusion of tissue plasminogen activator during primary PCI (CDT group), whereas 222 did not receive (non-CDT group). No significant differences in bleeding complications and in-hospital and long-term mortalities were observed (9.8% vs. 7.2%, p=0.53; 7.3% vs. 2.3%, p=0.11; and 12.6% vs. 17.5%, p=0.84, CDT vs. non-CDT). In patients who underwent antecedent aspiration thrombectomy during PCI (75.6%; CDT group and 87.4%; non-CDT group), thrombolysis in myocardial infarction grade 2 or 3 flow rate after thrombectomy was significantly lower in the CDT group than in the non-CDT group (32.2% vs. 61.0%, p<0.01). However, the final rates improved considerably without significant difference (90.3% vs. 97.4%, p=0.14). Conclusions: For STEMI patients with high thrombus burden, adjunctive CDT is safe and effective for improving coronary flow. CDT resulted in favorable coronary flow even after unsatisfactory aspiration thrombectomy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Noma et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with high thrombus burden (n=263). Adjunctive catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) with tissue plasminogen activator vs. No catheter-directed thrombolysis was evaluated on Bleeding complications (p=0.53). Adjunctive catheter-directed thrombolysis during primary PCI for STEMI with high thrombus burden showed no significant difference in bleeding complications (9.8% vs. 7.2%, p=0.53) compared to no CDT.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: