Key result
Peripheral heart action training elicited greater %VO2max, %HRmax, RPE, and EPOC compared to traditional hypertrophy training.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to compare the metabolic demands of peripheral heart action training to traditional hypertrophy training and evaluate between-sex differences for both resistance training styles.
Does peripheral heart action (PHA) training increase metabolic demands compared to traditional hypertrophy training in resistance-trained individuals?
Does peripheral heart action (PHA) training increase metabolic demands compared to traditional hypertrophy training in resistance-trained individuals?
Peripheral heart action training is a time-efficient, metabolically demanding alternative to traditional resistance training that may enhance cardiorespiratory adaptations.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PHA may offer a time-efficient, metabolically demanding alternative to traditional training; hypothesis-generating for cardiorespiratory adaptations and should not yet change practice.
Purpose: Peripheral heart action (PHA) is a style of circuit training that alternates upper and lower body resistance exercises with minimal rest between sets. The purpose of this study was to compare the metabolic demands of PHA to traditional hypertrophy training (TRAD) and to provide between sex comparison for both types of resistance training (RT). Methods: Twenty resistance-trained individuals underwent two bouts of volume-load matched RT: PHA and TRAD. We measured oxygen uptake (VO2), heart rate (HR), blood lactate (BL) concentration, rating of perceived exertion (RPE), excess post-exercise oxygen consumption (EPOC), and duration of each session. Results: PHA elicited significantly greater %VO2max (p < .001), %HRmax (p < .001), RPE (p < .001), and EPOC (p < .001) compared to TRAD. PHA was also completed in less time (p < .001). Compared to TRAD, BL was significantly higher at mid-exercise (p < .001), post-exercise (p < .001), and 5-min post-exercise (p < .001) during PHA. There were no between-sex differences for BL at any time-point for TRAD. However, during PHA, BL was significantly higher for males at mid-exercise (p = .04), post-exercise (p = .02), and 5-min post-exercise (p = .002). No between-sex differences were detected for HR, VO2, RPE, or duration for either style of RT. Conclusions: PHA is a time-effective and metabolically demanding circuit that may lead to strength and cardiorespiratory adaptations. Males produced more BL than females during PHA, but not TRAD, suggesting that they incurred more metabolic stress during the bout of circuit training.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mang et al. (2021) studied Healthy resistance-trained individuals (n=20). Peripheral heart action (PHA) training vs. Traditional hypertrophy training (TRAD) was evaluated on %VO2max, %HRmax, RPE, and EPOC (p=< .001). Peripheral heart action training elicited greater %VO2max, %HRmax, RPE, and EPOC compared to traditional hypertrophy training.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: