Key result
Aortic bifurcated bypass in a contemporary Indian cohort yielded a primary patency rate of 76.9%, compared to an overall patency of 84% in a historical cohort.
Why the study?
Does the clinical profile and outcome of aortic bifurcated bypass for occlusive disease differ between contemporary and historical cohorts in an Indian population?
Population
140 patients undergoing aortic bifurcated bypass for aortoiliac occlusive disease
Comparison
Contemporary cohort (2011 to 2020) vs historical cohort
Design
Single-center prospective database comparison study
Authors
Loading...
Comparable patency persists despite rising comorbidities; leaves open need for prospective validation before broader adoption.
Cohort (n=140)
No
Does the clinical profile and outcome of aortic bifurcated bypass for occlusive disease differ between contemporary and historical cohorts in an Indian population?
Absolute Event Rate: 76.9% vs 84%
Despite an increase in patient comorbidities over the past decade, outcomes of aortic bifurcated bypass for aortoiliac occlusive disease in India remain comparable to historical and Western data.
Kota et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) (n=140). Aortic bifurcated bypass (contemporary cohort) vs. Historical cohort was evaluated on Graft patency, amputation-free survival, and mortality. Aortic bifurcated bypass in a contemporary Indian cohort yielded a primary patency rate of 76.9%, compared to an overall patency of 84% in a historical cohort.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: