Pyrolysis of hyperbranched poly[1,1‘-ferrocenylene(methyl)silyne] ( 5 ) yields mesoporous, conductive, and magnetic ceramics ( 6 ). Sintering at high temperatures (1000−1200 °C) under nitrogen and argon converts 5 to 6N and 6A, respectively, in ∼48−62% yields. The ceramization yields of 5 are higher than that (∼36%) of its linear counterpart poly[1,1‘-ferrocenylene(dimethyl)silylene] ( 1 ), revealing that the hyperbranched polymer is superior to the linear one as a ceramic precursor. The ceramic products 6 are characterized by SEM, XPS, EDX, XRD, and SQUID. It is found that the ceramics are electrically conductive and possess a mesoporous architecture constructed of tortuously interconnected nanoclusters. The iron contents of 6 estimated by EDX are 36−43%, much higher than that (11%) of the ceramic 2 prepared from the linear precursor 1 . The nanocrystals in 6N are mainly α-Fe 2 O 3 whereas those in 6A are mainly Fe 3 Si. When magnetized by an external field at room temperature, 6A exhibits a high-saturation magnetization ( M s ∼ 49 emu/g) and near-zero remanence and coercivity; that is, 6A is an excellent soft ferromagnetic material with an extremely low hysteresis loss.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: