Key result
Machine learning algorithms using clinical risk factors and SNPs predicted high coronary artery calcification burden with approximately 70% sensitivity and 60% specificity (P<0.001).
Why the study?
Can machine learning algorithms using SNPs and clinical risk factors accurately predict high coronary artery calcification burden in hypertensive non-Hispanic White individuals?
Observational (n=720)
Can machine learning algorithms using SNPs and clinical risk factors accurately predict high coronary artery calcification burden in hypertensive non-Hispanic White individuals?
p-value: p=<0.001
Machine learning algorithms combining genetic and clinical risk factors can identify replicable predictors of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis with moderate sensitivity and specificity.
Caution against routine clinical use; leaves open whether ML-SNP integration improves CAC prediction beyond standard models.
As part of the Genetic Epidemiology Network of Arteriopathy study, hypertensive non-Hispanic White sibships were screened using 471 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to identify genes influencing coronary artery calcification (CAC) measured by computed tomography. Individuals with detectable CAC and CAC quantity > or =70th age- and sex-specific percentile were classified as having a high CAC burden and compared to individuals with CAC quantity <70th percentile. Two sibs from each sibship were randomly chosen and divided into two data sets, each with 360 unrelated individuals. Within each data set, we applied two machine learning algorithms, Random Forests and RuleFit, to identify the best predictors of having high CAC burden among 17 risk factors and 471 SNPs. Using five-fold cross-validation, both methods had approximately 70% sensitivity and approximately 60% specificity. Prediction accuracies were significantly different from random predictions (P-value<0.001) based on 1,000 permutation tests. Predictability of using 287 tagSNPs was as good as using all 471 SNPs. For Random Forests, among the top 50 predictors, the same eight tagSNPs and 15 risk factors were found in both data sets while eight tagSNPs and 12 risk factors were found in both data sets for RuleFit. Replicable effects of two tagSNPs (in genes GPR35 and NOS3) and 12 risk factors (age, body mass index, sex, serum glucose, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, cholesterol, homocysteine, triglycerides, fibrinogen, Lp(a) and low-density lipoprotein particle size) were identified by both methods. This study illustrates how machine learning methods can be used in sibships to identify important, replicable predictors of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2008) conducted an observational in Coronary artery calcification (n=720). Machine learning algorithms (Random Forests and RuleFit) vs. Random predictions was evaluated on High coronary artery calcification burden (detectable CAC and quantity ≥70th percentile) (p=<0.001). Machine learning algorithms using clinical risk factors and SNPs predicted high coronary artery calcification burden with approximately 70% sensitivity and 60% specificity (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: