In this section we prove results which really belong to the first two parts of the paper. In particular, we give another definition of the submodule T( W) c W (see 4) and write an explicit formula for the connection V on Y/Il.Y (see 12) in the case when all ~ (see (11.2)) are Weyl modules.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kazhdan et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: