Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In Brief Objective: The objective of this study was to compare 2 interventions promoting condoms and vaginal microbicides to prevent sexually transmitted disease (STD). Study: Women (N = 427) attending an STD clinic were randomly assigned to 2 clinician-delivered interventions and followed up monthly to assess condom/microbicide use and incidence of gonorrhea, chlamydia, and syphilis. Results: During follow up, condom use rates were 69% (enhanced) and 49% (basic) and microbicide use rates were 44% and 29%, respectively. STD rates did not significantly differ between intervention groups. Perfect condom use (regardless of intervention arm) was associated with a 3-fold decrease in STD rates (relative risk [RR], 0.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.1–0.8). Using a vaginal microbicide during ≥50% of the acts of intercourse was associated with reduced STD rates (RR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3–1.0) across intervention groups and condom use categories. Conclusions: The enhanced intervention increased use of condoms and vaginal microbicide; however, STD rates did not decrease because a protective effect was seen only among perfect barrier users, and the enhanced intervention only modestly increased perfect use. In a randomized trial with sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinic clients, women who received an intensive clinician-delivered intervention were more likely to use condoms and microbicides. The intervention did not seem to decrease STD rates, but consistent and correct condom users had fewer STDs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Artz et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: