Key result
The estimated prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy in US firefighters varied widely by assessment method, ranging from 0.0-5.3% by CMR, 3.3-32.8% by ECHO, and 45.4% in non-cardiac autopsies.
Cross-Sectional
The estimated prevalence of cardiac enlargement in US firefighters varies widely depending on the assessment modality (ECHO, CMR, or autopsy) and normalization techniques used.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Estimates of left ventricular hypertrophy in firefighters should not guide screening without standardization; leaves open accurate prevalence and optimal modality research.
Background: Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) accounts for 45% of on-duty deaths in US fire service; cardiac is common among US firefighters; and plays a major role in firefighter Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD). : To estimate the prevalence of cardiac enlargement in US Firefighters by autopsies, echocardiography (ECHO) and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR). : In the present cross-sectional study, the prevalence of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy (LVH)/ was a) estimated non-invasively among active career firefighters and b) examined by reviewing of firefighters who suffered a non-cardiac, on-duty fatality. Left ventricular mass (LVM) among active firefighters was assessed by ECHO and CMR, and normalized (indexed) for body surface area (BSA) and . Autopsy estimates were based on cardiac weights and other forensic parameters. : LVH prevalence estimates among active career firefighters presented a range from 3.3% to 32.8% ECHO; and 0.0% to 5.3% among CMR criteria. LVH was present in 17.5% and 0.4% of the active firefighters defined by LVM indexed to height 1.7 (by ECHO and CMR, respectively). LVM indexed to BSA as measured CMR indicated zero prevalence of LVH. Among non-cardiac traumatic autopsies, prevalence estimates of and LVH were 39.5% (95% CI 33.7–45.3) and 45.4% (95% CI 39.5–51.4) respectively, even after for age and BMI. : The prevalence of cardiac enlargement varied widely depending on the imaging assessment, cutoffs and the normalization techniques. For autopsy data, BMI was a major determinant of heart weight. CVD-outcome based studies are needed to provide evidence for the most accurate clinical cutoffs, while of autopsies is needed across protocols and jurisdictions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Korre et al. (2016) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiac enlargement / Left Ventricular Hypertrophy (LVH). Echocardiography (ECHO), Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR), and Autopsy was evaluated on Prevalence of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy (LVH) and cardiomegaly. The estimated prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy in US firefighters varied widely by assessment method, ranging from 0.0-5.3% by CMR, 3.3-32.8% by ECHO, and 45.4% in non-cardiac autopsies.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: