Key result
Reducing constitutive IK1 density in rat ventricular myocytes via genetic or pharmacological methods resulted in a significant increase in IK(ACh) current, suggesting it is largely underestimated.
The G protein-gated inward rectifier K+ current in ventricular myocytes is largely underestimated due to masking by constitutive I(K1), suggesting it may have greater physiological relevance than previously thought.
Inwardly-rectifying K+ channel subunits are not homogenously expressed in different cardiac tissues. In ventricular myocytes (VM) the background current-voltage relation is dominated by I(K1), carried by channels composed of Kir2.x subunits, which is less important in atrial myocytes (AM). On the other hand in AM a large G protein gated current carried by Kir3.1/3.4 complexes can be activated by stimulation of muscarinic M(2) receptors (I(K(ACh))), which is assumed to be marginal in VM. Recent evidence suggests that total current carried by cardiac inward-rectifiers (I(K(ATP)), I(K(ACh)), I(K1)) in both, AM and VM is limited, due to K+ accumulation/depletion. This lead us to hypothesize that in conventional whole celI recordings I(K(ACh)) in VM is underestimated as a consequence of constitutive I(K1). In that case a reduction in density of I(K1) should be paralleled by an increase in density of I(K(ACh)). Three different experimental strategies have been used to test for this hypothesis: (i) Adenovirus-driven expression of a dominant-negative mutant of Kir2.1, one of the subunits supposed to form I(K1) channels, in VM caused a reduction in I(K1)-density by about 80 %. In those cells I(K(ACh)) was increased about 4 fold. (ii) A comparable increase in I(K(ACh)) was observed upon reduction of I(K1) caused by adenovirus-mediated RNA interference.(iii) Ba2+ in a concentration of 2 microM blocks I(K1) in VM by about 60 % without affecting atrial I(K(ACh)). The reduction in I(K1) by 2 microM Ba2+ is paralleled by a reversible increase in I(K(ACh)) by about 100%. These data demonstrate that the increase in K+ conductance underlying ventricular I(K(ACh)) is largely underestimated, suggesting that it might be of greater physiological relevance than previously thought.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beckmann et al. (2008) studied this question. Reduction of IK1 (via dominant-negative mutant of Kir2.1, RNA interference, or Ba2+) vs. Baseline/control cells with normal IK1 was evaluated on IK(ACh) density/current. Reducing constitutive IK1 density in rat ventricular myocytes via genetic or pharmacological methods resulted in a significant increase in IK(ACh) current, suggesting it is largely underestimated.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: