Why the study?
Does implant duration affect the in vivo sensitivity of electromagnetic flow transducers in non-human primates?
Does implant duration affect the in vivo sensitivity of electromagnetic flow transducers in non-human primates?
In vivo sensitivity of electromagnetic flow transducers fluctuates initially but stabilizes after 3-4 weeks, allowing accurate prediction based on in vitro or terminal in vivo sensitivity.
This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Twenty-three electromagnetic flow transducers with lumen diameters of 3.5-6.0 mm were implanted in rhesus monkeys and baboonss for 12 h to 120 days. Each flow transducer was calibrated 1) in vitro on dialysis tubing with saline before implantation, 2) in vivo the last day of the implant period, and 3) again in vitro after the flow transducer was recovered. Three other flow transducers were implanted on femoral arteries of baboon just central to an arteriovenous Silastic shunt, and were calibrated in vivo daily for 23-47 days. In vitro sensitivity was not affected by implant durations of up to 120 days. In vivo sensitivity fluctuated unpredictably for the first 3-4 wk of implant, after which it followed a systematic course that depended on the lumen size. In vivo sensitivity at any time during implant (after the initial period) could be accurately predicted by knowing either the in vitro sensitivity or the terminal in vivo sensitivity.
Requires caution with early post-implant flow data in primates; leaves open clinical translation and long-term human reliability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Astley et al. (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: