Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The geometries of substituted sulfonamides [sulfonamide ( I ) sulfamic acid ( II ), sulfamide ( III ), methane sulfonamide ( IV ), 1,1,1-trifluoromethanesulfonamide ( V ), 4-aminobenzenesulfonamide ( VI ), 1,2-benzisothiazol-3-(2H)-one-1,1-dioxide (saccharin) ( VII ), N -(5-sulfamoyl-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2yl)acetamide (acetazolamide) ( VIII ), 4-(aminosulfonyl)- N -[(4-fluorophenyl)methyl]-benzamide (1I9L) ( IX ), ( R )-(+)-4-(ethylamino)-2-(3-methoxypropyl)-3,4-dihydro-2H-thieno[3,2-e]-1,2-thiazine-6-sulfonamide-1,-dioxide (brinzolamide) ( X ), and (4 S - trans )-(+)-4-(ethylamino)-5,6-dihydro-6-methyl-4H-thieno-[2,3-b]thiopyran-2-sulfonamide 7,7-dioxide (dorzolamide) ( XI )] in both neutral and deprotonated forms, were optimized using CBS-QB3 theory (compounds I − IV), the Becke3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) method (compounds I − VIII ), and the two-layered ONIOM(B3LYP 6-311+G(d,p): MNDO) method (compounds VIII - XI ). Sulfamic acid behaves in the gas phase as O-acid. The investigated acids are weak acids with calculated acidity of about 1320−1420 kJ mol -1 . Of the N-acids studied, saccharin possesses the highest gas-phase acidity (1324 kJ mol -1 ). The acidities of phenyl-substituted derivatives computed using the hybrid ONIOM (B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p): MNDO) method are in good agreement with the full DFT ones, and this method can be adopted to model large substituted sulfonamides.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Milan Remko (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: