Why the study?
Does demand-induced ischemia by atrial pacing and norepinephrine cause myocardial necrosis or hibernation in swine with 80% coronary stenosis?
Does demand-induced ischemia by atrial pacing and norepinephrine cause myocardial necrosis or hibernation in swine with 80% coronary stenosis?
Sustained demand-induced ischemia in the presence of coronary stenosis leads to a state of myocardial hibernation characterized by depressed function and matched reductions in blood flow and oxygen consumption, without progressing to necrosis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Indicates hibernation as adaptive response to relieved demand ischemia; leaves open clinical translation from this animal model.
BACKGROUND: We tested the hypotheses that prolonged, demand-induced myocardial ischemia plateaus and that on relief of stress, myocardial function remains depressed, with proportionate reductions in blood flow and oxygen consumption indicative of hibernation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Closed-chest swine (n = 20) were prepared with an 80% coronary stenosis. Hemodynamics, myocardial blood flow, oxygen, and lactate metabolism were measured in group 1 (n = 9) (1) at baseline, (2) at 10 and 30 minutes of atrial pacing plus intravenous norepinephrine infusion, and (3) in 5 of 9 (group 1a) at approximately 50 minutes after stress. Group 1a had ischemia assessed with 99mTc-labeled BMS 181321. In group 2 (n = 11), myocardial function was determined with radionuclide ventriculography (n = 8), and myocardial necrosis was looked for with trichlorotetrazolium chloride staining (n = 7), histology (n = 10), and myocardial creatine kinase concentration (n = 4). Baseline stenotic-zone endocardial blood flow was reduced versus the normal zone (0.94 +/- 0.33 versus 1.38 +/- 0.27 mL.min-1.g-1, mean +/- SD; P < .05), whereas epicardial flows were comparable (1.15 +/- 0.36 versus 1.16 +/- 0.26 mL.min-1.g-1). Stenotic-zone endocardial flow was unchanged versus baseline at 10 and 30 minutes of stress, whereas epicardial flow increased (1.62 +/- 0.53 mL.min-1.g-1 at 10 minutes and 1.44 +/- 0.51 mL.min-1.g-1 at 30 minutes, both P < .05). Myocardial oxygen consumption increased versus baseline (10.8 +/- 2.9 mL.min-1.100 g-1) at 10 and 30 minutes of stress (14.9 +/- 5.2 and 13.9 +/- 4.5 mL.min-1.100 g-1, both P < .05). After stress, stenotic-zone blood flow and oxygen consumption were reduced approximately 30% (P < .01) versus baseline. In group 2, stenotic-zone contraction with stress declined versus baseline and remained depressed throughout recovery. Histological and biochemical evidence of myocardial necrosis was absent in group 2. CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial ischemia induced by a sustained increase in oxygen demand may not progress to necrosis but may instead plateau. After relief of stress, myocardial function remains depressed, with a proportionate reduction in blood flow and oxygen consumption consistent with myocardial hibernation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berman et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: