Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Murine epidermal growth factor (EGF), a 53 amino acid protein, has been modified by enzymic digestion, site-specific chemical reactions, and recombinant DNA technology. After trypsin digestion the EGF derivatives EGF1-48 (called EGF-T) and EGF1-45 (called EGF-T2) were separated from the residual EGF and the C-terminal pentapeptide by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. EGF-T competes for binding to EGF receptors with the same efficiency as EGF. The EGF-T2 derivative had no detectable receptor binding activity even at 100 nM. The in vitro mitogenic potencies of EGF and EGF-T for Balb/c 3T3 cells were indistinguishable. Treatment of EGF-T with carboxypeptidase Y yielded two derivatives, EGF-T-(des-Arg48) and EGF-T-des(Leu47-Arg48). There was only a 3-7-fold diminution in the binding efficiency and mitogenic potency for EGF-T-(des-Arg48). However, there was more than a 100-fold decrease in the binding efficiency and mitogenic activity of EGF-T-des (Leu47-Arg48). These results indicated that Leu47 is intimately involved in the formation of the ligand-receptor complex. Studies with a number of proteases indicated that the C-terminus of EGF was susceptible to enzymic digestion; however, the N-terminus appears to be folded into a conformation which prevents access to proteolytic digestion. Consequently, the N-terminus was modified by preparing an analogue with recombinant DNA technology. Oligonucleotides corresponding to EGF(3-48). Met3 Lys21 residues were ligated in frame to a beta-galactosidase expression vector. The beta-Gal-EGF fusion protein was cleaved with cyanogen bromide and EGF(4-48).Lys21 purified.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burgess et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: