This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background: Early detection of a reduction in visual acuity (VA) in children is crucial for their education, job prospects, and overall well-being. In many regions, this is deficient because of limited access to eye-care services, adversely affecting the well-being of visually impaired children. There is, therefore, a need for alternative vision screening methods. Aim: This study assessed teachers’ efficacy in VA screenings for rural primary school students. Setting: The study was conducted in a rural primary school in the Pinetown Education District, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Methods: The same group of children was tested by both teachers and final-year optometry students for comparison. The methodology adhered to the Standard School Eye Health Guidelines for low- to middle-income countries. Screening tools involved a 6/60 tumbling E optotype and a line of five 6/12 optotypes. Results: Teachers screened 256 children between ages 6 and 12 years. Their results showed a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 99.2%, a positive predictive value of 33%, and a negative predictive value of 100%. All teachers acknowledged the importance of vision screening and committed to integrating it into their skill set. Conclusion: The findings reveal that teachers can match eye-care professionals’ efficacy in visual screenings. Training them can facilitate early detection and referrals, mitigating vision impairment’s negative impacts on a child’s education and overall well-being. Contribution: This original research study highlights the success of task shifting as a strategy to address human resource challenges for eye care in South Africa.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Govender-Poonsamy et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: