Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We have previously shown that the c-Src tyrosine kinase is activated four- to fivefold when cultured keratinocytes differentiate following the elevation of intracellular calcium levels. In contrast to c-Src, another Src family tyrosine kinase, c-Yes, was rapidly inactivated in these same cells, despite its marked similarity in structure and enzymatic activity to c-Src. The inactivation of c-Yes was independent of the protein kinase C pathway, which is usually activated by elevation of intracellular calcium levels. The protein levels of c-Src and c-Yes were not altered, but the phosphotyrosine content of both proteins was greatly reduced. As has been demonstrated for c-Src, in vitro dephosphorylation of c-Yes by incubation with protein tyrosine phosphatases also resulted in its activation, not inactivation. In vitro reconstitution experiments showed that c-Yes can be inactivated by preincubation with a Ca(2+)-supplemented cell extract and that this inhibition was reversed by the addition of EGTA [ethylene glycol-bis(beta-aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid]. Gradient sedimentation of cell lysates showed that in cells treated with calcium and ionophore, c-Yes formed complexes with two distinct cellular proteins, whereas similar complexes were not seen in c-Src immunoprecipitates. One of these two proteins has the ability to inhibit c-Yes kinase activity in vitro. Finally, the Ca(2+)-dependent inactivation of c-Yes was observed in kidney tubular cells and fibroblasts, suggesting that the Ca(2+)-dependent regulation of c-Yes tyrosine kinase is not unique to keratinocytes. We postulate that c-Yes is inactivated through a Ca2+ -dependent association with cellular proteins, which seems to override its activation resulting from tyrosine dephosphorylation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: