Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
FPGA-based accelerators have recently evolved as strong competitors to the traditional GPU-based accelerators in modern high-performance computing systems. They offer both high computational capabilities and considerably lower energy consumption. High-level synthesis (HLS) can be used to overcome the main hurdle in the mainstream usage of the FPGA-based accelerators, i.e., the complexity of their design flow. HLS enables the designers to program an FPGA directly by using high-level languages, e.g., C, C++, SystemC, and OpenCL. This paper presents an HLS-based FPGA implementation of several algorithms from a variety of application domains. A performance comparison in terms of execution time, energy, and power consumption with some high-end GPUs is performed as well. The algorithms have been modeled in OpenCL for both GPU and FPGA implementation. We conclude that FPGAs are much more energy-efficient than GPUs in all the test cases that we considered. Moreover, FPGAs can sometimes be faster than GPUs by using an FPGA-specific OpenCL programming style and utilizing a variety of appropriate HLS directives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muslim et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: