Why the study?
Does 12-lead ECG evaluation accurately differentiate cardiac amyloidosis from nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Does 12-lead ECG evaluation accurately differentiate cardiac amyloidosis from nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Simple 12-lead ECG parameters, particularly low voltage in limb leads and specific QRS/R wave voltages in leads I and avR, provide high diagnostic accuracy for differentiating cardiac amyloidosis from nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
ECG voltage criteria may aid differentiation of amyloidosis from nonobstructive HCM; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
UNLABELLED: Due to similar manifestations of hypertensive ventricular walls and abnormal ventricular compliance, it is difficult to differentiate cardiac amyloidosis (CA) and nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (NOHCM) clinically. The purpose of the study was to investigate the value of electrocardiography (ECG) in the differentiation of the two diseases. METHODS: We enrolled 46 consecutive patients with CA and 64 patients with NOHCM and compared their ECG characteristics.Compared with NOHCM patients, the ECG of CA patients showed more low voltage on limb leads (50% versus 1.6%), atrioventricular block (21.7% versus 4.7%), pseudo-infarct pattern (84.8% versus 39.1%), and longer QRS duration (104 ± 25 versus 98 ± 14 ms) (all P < 0.05). The QRS complex voltage of avR demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance (sensitivity 89%, specificity 94%, cut-off value 0.45mV) as assessed by ROC analysis. The combination of the R wave voltage of I and avR reached a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 87% for the diagnosis of amyloidosis.Compared with NOHCM patients, CA patients showed more ECG characteristics of low voltage on limb leads, pseudo-infarct pattern, atrioventricular block, and longer QRS duration. The combination of the R wave voltage of I, avR, and QRS was of diagnostic value in the differentiation of CA from NOHCM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: