Why the study?
Does magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) improve the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in survivors of cardiac arrest?
Does magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) improve the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in survivors of cardiac arrest?
MRI may be a useful diagnostic tool for identifying acute myocardial infarction in survivors of cardiac arrest when standard criteria (biomarkers and ECG) are inconclusive.
May aid AMI diagnosis post-resuscitation when standard tests are inconclusive; hypothesis-generating, prospective validation required before adoption.
The ventricular arrhythmias with underlying coronary artery disease are a leading cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD). While the SCD survivors with proven AMI are considered to be at low risk of SCD recurrence, those without the evidence of AMI represent a high risk group that benefits from implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Therefore, the evaluation of SCD survivors for the presence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) as a triggering factor of cardiac arrest is essential. In SCD survivors, the use of the standard diagnostic criteria of AMI may be difficult, as both serum cardiac biomarkers and electrocardiogram can be influenced by previous cardiac arrest. A novel technique that may be used for the diagnosis of AMI is magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We report its use in four patients after cardiopulmonary resuscitation where the diagnosis of AMI could not be definitely established or excluded by means of other diagnostic procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Solař et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: