Why the study?
Does a commercially available hand-held metal detector reliably detect Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices?
Does a commercially available hand-held metal detector reliably detect Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices?
A simple hand-held metal detector can reliably detect implanted cardiac devices with 100% sensitivity, offering a practical screening tool before cremation or burial.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support metal detector screening for CIEDs before cremation; leaves open need for prospective validation.
OBJECTIVE: Explosions of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs) (pacemakers, defibrillators, and loop recorders) are a well-recognized problem during cremation, due to lithium-iodine batteries. In addition, burial of the deceased with a CIED can present a potential risk for environmental contamination. Therefore, detection of CIEDs in the deceased would be of value. This study evaluated a commercially available metal detector for detecting CIEDs. DESIGN: Observational study including pacemaker patients (n = 70) and a control group without pacemaker (n = 95). The investigational device was a hand-held metal detector for detecting metal or electricity wiring. RESULTS: The metal detector detected the pacemaker in all pacemaker patients and thus exhibited a sensitivity of 100%. The specificity of the metal detector was 86%, and the negative predictive value was 100%. Thirteen individuals without pacemakers were falsely identified as having an implanted device due to implanted prosthetic material or elements of clothing. CONCLUSION: A simple hand-held metal detector may detect CIEDs with a high sensitivity. It may be of value in detecting CIEDs in deceased persons before burial or cremation. Any signal detected by the metal detector should prompt further investigation of the body and patient files.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hjortshøj et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: