Key result
Postmortem CIED analysis links devices to cause or manner of death in ~50% of cases.
Why the study?
Postmortem analysis of cardiac implantable electronic devices is not routinely performed despite increasing prevalence and potential clinical and forensic value.
Does postmortem analysis of CIEDs help evaluate the time, cause, and manner of death in deceased patients with these devices?
Observational (n=14)
Does postmortem analysis of CIEDs help evaluate the time, cause, and manner of death in deceased patients with these devices?
Postmortem analysis of CIEDs can provide valuable forensic and clinical information regarding the time, cause, and manner of death.
The prevalence of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) is increasing. However, postmortem analysis of CIEDs is not performed routinely. Fourteen consecutive CIEDs were analyzed. The indication for and date of implantation, technical data, CIED reprogramming, heart rhythm disturbances, patient demographics and medical consultations were investigated. Death during the first year after implantation was seen in 54%, whereof 71% consulted a physician within 10 days before death. The time of death was attributed to a particular day in 29%. There was a relationship between CIEDs and cause/manner of death in 50%. Although limited by a small sample size, this study advocates the routine postmortem CIED analysis for forensic and clinical purposes in selected cases. Patients with CIEDs seem to show an increased risk of death during the first year after implantation. The analysis of CIEDs can be helpful in evaluating the time/cause/manner of death.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mauf et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Deceased patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) (n=14). Postmortem CIED analysis was evaluated on Relationship between CIEDs and cause/manner of death. Postmortem analysis of 14 consecutive CIEDs identified a relationship between the devices and the cause or manner of death in 50% of cases.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: