Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The behaviour of substrate mimetics in mediating the acceptance of nonspecific acyl moieties by proteases has been investigated as a direct function of their site-specific ester leaving groups. In this contribution we report on a computational approach to rationalise this interplay and to predict the power of a potential ester moiety to act as a suitable substrate mimetic for a given enzyme by means of an automated docking procedure. Investigations with seven distinct substrate mimetics and two proteases, subtilisin and chymotrypsin, show a clear correlation between the theoretically calculated binding energies DeltaE and the specificity constants k(cat)KM(-1) obtained from parallel hydrolysis kinetic studies. These results prove the general function of the docking approach as a rational model not only in predicting the general acceptance of a substrate mimetic in a qualitative manner, but also to provide reliable information on its individual specificity towards proteases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Günther et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: