Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Dipeptide amides H-D-Leu-Phe-NH-R have been found to assume a conformation induced by the CH/π interaction and to inhibit chymotrypsin strongly. A series of benzyl amide derivatives H-D-Leu-Phe-NH-[CH2]n-C6H5(n= 0–4) have been assayed for chymotrypsin. They inhibit the enzyme in a competitive manner and the highest inhibition is achieved by the amide of n= 1 (Ki= 3.6 × 10–6M). The activity enhancement is dependent upon the length of methylene chain, not upon the increase in molecular hydrophobicity, indicating the presence of an optimal distance between dipeptide backbone and C-terminal phenyl group for chymotrypsin inhibition. The C-terminal phenyl group has been found to interact with chymotrypsin stereospecifically. The R-isomer of H-D-Leu-Phe-NH-CH(CH3)-C6H5 is as active as the benzyl amide, while the S-isomer is about twenty-fold less active. When the fluorine atom is introduced at a para-position of the C-terminal phenyl group, the resulting dipeptide H-D-Leu-Phe-NH-CH2-C6H4F-p exhibits about six-times increased inhibitory activity (Ki= 6.1 × 10–7M; this dipeptide is one of the most potent chymotrypsin inhibitors to date). 1H NMR conformational analyses of these dipeptide amide derivatives show the CH/π interaction between D-Leu-isobutyl and Phe-phenyl as a key structural element for chymotrypsin inhibition. These structural examinations strongly suggest that in the inhibitory conformation the C-terminal phenyl group fits the chymotrypsin S1 site, while the hydrophobic core constructed by D-Leu-Phe CH/π interaction fits the chymotrypsin S2 or S1′ site.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shimohigashi et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: