Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ks values for binding of selected substrates, competitive inhibitors, and a noncompetitive inhibitor were found to be similar for alpha-chymotrypsin and N-methyl-alpha-chymotrypsin. The rates and steps of binding of a competitive inhibitor and a noncompetitive inhibitor were also found to be similar for alpha-chymotrypsin and N-methyl-alpha-chymotrypsin. Therefore, N-methyl-alpha-chymotrypsin is an appropriate model for alpha-chymotrypsin in studying the dynamics of the binding of substrates by temperature-jump techniques in aqueous solvents. 2-Toluidinylnaphthalene-6-sulfonate, a noncompetitive inhibitor, bound to alpha-chymotrypsin in a single step with rate constants k1 and k-1 of 3.9 X 10(7) M-1 s-1 and 1.9 X 10(3) s-1, respectively, at pH 5.0 (0.2 M acetate, ionic strength of 0.2). Similar values were obtained for N-methyl-alpha-chymotrypsin and chymotrypsinogen A at pH 5.0 and for alpha-chymotrypsin at pH 7.8 [0.1 M tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane-0.03 M CaCl2]. Indole, a competitive inhibitor, bound to alpha-chymotrypsin in a single step at pH 5.0 and 7.8, with k1 and k-1 of 1.8 X 10(7) M-1 s-1 and 7.8 X 10(3) s-1, respectively, at pH 5.0 while proflavin, another competitive inhibitor, bound to alpha-chymotrypsin with two observable steps where k1, k-1, k2, and k-2 were 1.0 X 10(7) M-1 s-1, 7 X 10(2) s-1, 1.0 X 10(3) s-1, and 7 X 10(2) s-1, respectively, at pH 5.0. The specific substrate N-acetyl-L-3,5-dinitrotyrosine ethyl ester bound to N-methyl-alpha-chymotrypsin at pH 5.0 in three observable steps where k1, k-1, k2, k-2, k3, and k-3 were 3.7 X 10(7) M-1 s-1, 6.2 X 10(4) s-1, 1.2 X 10(3) s-1, 3.5 X 10(2) s-1, 3 X 10(2) s-1, and 4 X 10(2) s-1, respectively. Preliminary data indicated that the third step of this reaction is probably absent when Met192 of N-methyl-alpha-chymotrypsin is oxidized to methionine sulfoxide. These results confirm the validity of data obtained from reactions at subzero temperatures in 65% dimethyl sulfoxide in indicating multiple steps in the binding of substrates to alpha-chymotrypsin. The methodology described should make it possible to measure quantitatively the contribution of the binding process to enzyme catalysis (the Circe effect).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maehler et al. (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: