For the first time a number of derivatives and terminally blocked model peptides (to the pentapeptide level) of the sterically demanding Cα-methyl-homo-phenylalanine, (αMe)Hph, residue have been synthesized (by solution methods) and fully characterized. The results of a solution conformational analysis, performed by using FTIR and 1H NMR spectroscopies, favour the conclusion that (αMe)Hph is as potent a β-turn and helix promoter as (αMe)Phe (Cα-methylphenylalanine) and (αEt)Phe (Cα-ethylphenylalanine), and more potent than the Phe parent amino acid. In addition, a CD study of Nαpara-bromobenzoylated peptides suggests that the relationship between (αMe)Hph α-carbon chirality and the prevailing screw sense of the turn and helical structures that are formed is opposite to that found for (αMe)Phe and (αEt)Phe peptides, i.e. L-amino acids give right-handed helicities. This relationship is the same as that exhibited by protein amino acids, including Phe.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Polese et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: