Why the study?
18F-FDG PET/CT is considered reliable for distant metastases in angiosarcomas, but false-negative findings can occur.
Does 18F-FDG PET/CT accurately detect bone metastases in patients with angiosarcoma compared to MRI?
Does 18F-FDG PET/CT accurately detect bone metastases in patients with angiosarcoma compared to MRI?
18F-FDG PET/CT may yield false-negative results for bone metastases in angiosarcoma, highlighting the need for MRI and open biopsy when suspected.
False-negative bone metastases on 18F-FDG PET/CT in angiosarcoma warrant staging caution; leaves open need for prospective validation of complementary imaging.
RATIONALE: Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) is considered a reliable and indispensable imaging method when evaluating distant metastases and clinical staging of angiosarcomas. Here, we report 2 cases of angiosarcoma with bone metastases with "false negative" findings on 18F-FDG PET/CT. PATIENT CONCERNS: Case 1, a 39-year-old woman, who had undergone mastectomy for primary angiosarcoma 2 years prior, presented with a 5-month history of right coxalgia. Case 2 was a 37-year-old woman, who had undergone mastectomy for primary angiosarcoma 4 months prior. During postoperative follow-up, multiple bone lesions were detected on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). DIAGNOSES: Based on the histopathological findings, both cases were diagnosed with bone metastases of angiosarcoma. Although MRI showed multiple bone metastatic lesions, 18F-FDG PET/CT showed no uptake or osteolytic destruction in both cases. INTERVENTIONS: Weekly paclitaxel was initiated as a salvage chemotherapy in both cases. OUTCOMES: No uptake or osteolytic lesions were observed on 18F-FDG PET/CT, despite multiple bone metastases detected on MRI. LESSONS: False-negative findings on 18F-FDG PET/CT should be considered when evaluating bone metastases of angiosarcoma. Even with negative findings on 18F-FDG PET/CT, open biopsy should be performed if MRI indicates bone metastases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ariga et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: