Why the study?
Does an AI system improve the detection of cardiac amyloidosis-suggestive uptake on scintigraphy compared to clinicians in patients undergoing scintigraphy?
Does an AI system improve the detection of cardiac amyloidosis-suggestive uptake on scintigraphy compared to clinicians in patients undergoing scintigraphy?
An AI system can reliably detect cardiac amyloidosis on routine scintigraphy scans, outperforming human readers and predicting overall mortality.
AI may aid cardiac amyloidosis detection on Tc-scintigraphy; hypothesis-generating before prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Tc-scintigraphy data across multiple tracers and scanners. METHODS: Tc-pyrophosphate) after tracer injection and if patients' imaging and clinical data could not be linked. Ground truth annotation was derived from centralised core-lab consensus reading of at least three independent experts (CN, TT-W, and JN). An AI system for detection of cardiac amyloidosis-associated high-grade cardiac tracer uptake was developed using data from one centre (Austria) and independently validated in the remaining centres. A multicase, multireader study and a medical algorithmic audit were conducted to assess clinician performance compared with AI and to evaluate and correct failure modes. The system's prognostic value in predicting mortality was tested in the consecutively recruited cohorts using cox proportional hazards models for each cohort individually and for the combined cohorts. FINDINGS: The prevalence of cases positive for cardiac amyloidosis-suggestive uptake was 142 (2%) of 9176 patients in the Austrian, 125 (2%) of 6763 patients in the UK, 63 (62%) of 102 patients in the Chinese, and 103 (52%) of 200 patients in the Italian cohorts. In the Austrian cohort, cross-validation performance showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 1·000 (95% CI 1·000-1·000). Independent validation yielded AUCs of 0·997 (0·993-0·999) for the UK, 0·925 (0·871-0·971) for the Chinese, and 1·000 (0·999-1·000) for the Italian cohorts. In the multicase multireader study, five physicians disagreed in 22 (11%) of 200 cases (Fleiss' kappa 0·89), with a mean AUC of 0·946 (95% CI 0·924-0·967), which was inferior to AI (AUC 0·997 [0·991-1·000], p=0·0040). The medical algorithmic audit demonstrated the system's robustness across demographic factors, tracers, scanners, and centres. The AI's predictions were independently prognostic for overall mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1·44 [95% CI 1·19-1·74], p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION: AI-based screening of cardiac amyloidosis-suggestive uptake in patients undergoing scintigraphy was reliable, eliminated inter-rater variability, and portended prognostic value, with potential implications for identification, referral, and management pathways. FUNDING: Pfizer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Spielvogel et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: