Rib stress injury is a significant concern in elite rowing, disrupting training and competition. This study aimed to assess the reliability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-derived bone mineral density (BMD) measurements in elite rowers across total body and rib-specific regions of interest (ROIs). It further sought to identify the most ecologically valid rib ROI for detecting sport-specific adaptations in rowers by comparing region-specific BMD patterns across sports with contracting loading patterns (collision sports and lower body endurance). The study comprised three parts: Part A assessed intrarater reliability in 35 rowers via test-retest scans 24 hr apart; Part B evaluated interrater reliability between trained technicians in 35 nonathletes; and Part C compared rib BMD patterns across 60 elite athletes of different sport types (rowing = mechanical strain, rugby = collision, and endurance track athletes = no loading). Four rib ROIs were analyzed: standard, mod-standard, supraclavicular, and subclavicular. Reliability was determined using coefficient of variation (CV%), typical error of measurement, and intraclass correlation coefficients. Rib ROIs demonstrated excellent intrarater reliability (CV%: 0.78%-2.00%; intraclass correlation coefficients: .963-.995) and minimal interrater error (CV%: 0.34%-0.50%). Cross-sectional comparisons showed that female rowers and rugby players exhibited similar rib-to-total-body BMD patterns, as did male rowers and track athletes (p > .05). Notably, rowers displayed significantly lower relative subclavicular rib BMD compared with rugby players (p < .05). Rib BMD is reliably measurable across technicians in high-performance settings. The subclavicular ROI may be best suited for monitoring rib BMD in rowers, but further investigation is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rossi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: