Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To assess the prevalence and severity of dry-eye disease in patients with myopia being evaluated for laser in situ keratomileusis. SETTING: Nine ophthalmology centers in Russia. DESIGN: Prospective noninterventional cross-sectional study. METHODS: The assessments included the Schirmer I test, tear breakup time (TBUT), lissamine green and fluorescein staining (Oxford grading scheme), Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, and Dry Eye Workshop (DEWS) dry-eye severity grading. RESULTS: The study comprised 400 patients with myopia (mean age 29.7 years); 145 (36.2%) wore contact lenses, and 81 (20.2%) used topical dry-eye medication. The mean Schirmer test score was 15.2 mm; 36.5% of patients had evidence of tear-volume deficiency (Schirmer score ≤10 mm). The mean TBUT was 11.7 seconds; 10.1% of patients had tear-film instability (TBUT <5 seconds). Conjunctival (lissamine green) staining intensity was categorized as minimal or greater (grade ≥1) in 62.3% of patients and mild or greater (grade ≥2) in 22.8% of patients. The mean OSDI score was 20.4, indicating mild ocular disability. Dry-eye severity (DEWS grading) was mild/episodic in 66.2%, moderate in 29.5%, and severe in 4.3% of patients. No clear correlation was evident between the Schirmer/TBUT scores and the lissamine green/OSDI scores. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of dry eye in this population was estimated at approximately 10% to 40% (based on clinical signs) and 40% to 55% (based on symptoms); dry-eye severity was predominantly mild/episodic. The proportion of patients requiring dry-eye therapy (based on OSDI and DEWS severity findings) was almost 2 times higher than the proportion receiving treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dmitry Yurevich Maychuk (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: