The SAWS is a valid and reliable measure of satisfaction with abilities and well-being among persons with rheumatoid arthritis.
May support SAWS inclusion in RA research; leaves open its role in clinical assessment.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a questionnaire to measure satisfaction with abilities and well-being of persons with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We used data from a panel study of persons with RA (n = 446). The 13 items of the Satisfaction with Abilities and Well-Being Scale (SAWS) were based on problematic aspects of RA and domains of life activities. RESULTS: The SAWS demonstrated internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.93). Two subscales were identified, Satisfaction with Abilities and Satisfaction with Well-Being, which also demonstrated internal consistency (alpha = 0.91 and alpha = 0.82, respectively). Construct validity was supported by significant correlations with psychosocial and clinical variables. After controlling for demographic, psychosocial, and clinical characteristics, there was a significant inverse association between SAWS scores and depressive symptoms scores. CONCLUSIONS: The SAWS appears to be a valid and reliable measure of satisfaction with abilities and well-being among persons with RA. Longitudinal studies will examine the role of satisfaction in the development of depressive symptoms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Katz et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: