This article describes the process of implementing the HCR-20 into clinical practice at two Swedish forensic psychiatric hospitals. Since the instrument is fairly new, the interrater reliability was checked in a very comprehensive way. Seven clinicians undertook the task of assessing 43 violent offenders admitted to a forensic psychiatric hospital. These assessments were done independently of each other; no discussions of the cases were allowed between the assessors. The outcome is very encouraging, with a high internal consistency and high interrater reliability overall. The whole process of implementing a research instrument into clinical practice is described, how it was done, and what experiences were found.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Henrik Belfrage (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: