Why the study?
The R2CHADS2 score, originally developed for thromboembolic risk assessment, was evaluated to determine its predictive value for contrast-induced nephropathy and long-term MACE in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI.
Does the R2CHADS2 score predict contrast-induced nephropathy and long-term MACE in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI?
Does the R2CHADS2 score predict contrast-induced nephropathy and long-term MACE in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI?
The R2CHADS2 score, originally for thromboembolic risk, effectively stratifies the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy and long-term adverse cardiovascular outcomes in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI.
R2CHADS2 may aid CIN and MACE risk stratification post-PCI; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is a serious complication following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The Renal dysfunction, Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age ≥75 years, Diabetes mellitus and prior Stroke R2CHADS2 score, originally developed for thromboembolic risk assessment, has recently been proposed as a predictor of CIN and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). The present study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the R2CHADS2 score for CIN and long-term MACE in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI (pPCI). A total of 1204 STEMI patients were included in this retrospective study. Patients were categorized into 3 risk groups based on their R2CHADS2 scores. CIN incidence was significantly higher in the high-risk group (37.1%) compared with the moderate (13.6%) and low-risk groups (5.5%; P < .001). Hemodialysis was required in 14.3% of high-risk patients ( P < .001). MACE occurred in 49.3% of the high-risk group, 22.1% of the moderate-risk group, and 12.9% of the low-risk group ( P < .001). These findings suggest that the R2CHADS2 score can predict CIN and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in STEMI patients undergoing pPCI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Şahin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: