Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate tunnel positioning on radiographs in single-bundle and double-bundle ACL reconstruction and to determine whether these measurements are accurate and reproducible.
Are the quadrant method and Amis and Jakob method accurate and reproducible for evaluating tunnel positioning in single- and double-bundle ACL reconstruction?
Are the quadrant method and Amis and Jakob method accurate and reproducible for evaluating tunnel positioning in single- and double-bundle ACL reconstruction?
The quadrant method and the Amis and Jakob method are accurate and reproducible for measuring tunnel position in ACL reconstruction radiographs.
Supports single-bundle ACL tunnel measurement reproducibility; leaves open validation in double-bundle and prospective cohorts.
Aim To evaluate tunnel positioning on radiographs in singlebundle (SB) and double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, to evaluate if measurement is accurate and reproducible. Methods Radiographs of 30 SB and 30 DB ACL reconstruction were reviewed by two examiners who measured tunnel positioning with the quadrant method on the femur (a=depth, b=height) and the Amis and Jakob method on the tibia. Intra- and inter-observer reliability were evaluated with intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Results A radiographic analysis was completed in all patients in a SB-group and in 27 in a DB-group (p>0.05). Intra-observer reliability was almost perfect on femoral (ICC: a=0.85, b=0.83) and tibial (ICC=0.87) side in the SB-group. In the DB-group, it was almost perfect for tibial anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundles (ICC: AM=0.84, PL=0.81) and for femoral PL bundle (ICC: a=0.83, b=0.82), and substantial for femoral AM bundle (ICC: a=0.78, b=0.74). Inter-observer reliability was almost perfect on tibial (ICC=0.81) and femoral (ICC: a=0.81, b=0.87) side in the SB-group, and substantial on tibial (ICC: AM=0.71, PL=0.77) and femoral (ICC: AM a=0.73, b=0.78; PL a=0.74, b=0.76) side in the DB-group. Standard deviation (SD) was low (±9%) with respect to the centre of tunnel(s). Conclusion The quadrant method and the Amis and Jakob method are accurate and reproducible measurement methods. Also, as SD was low, an outside-in approach with a front-entry guide, which is free-hand positioned, can be postulated as a reliable method to locate the femoral tunnel in SB reconstruction and the AM bundle in DB reconstruction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Losco et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: