Set-based multiobjective optimization methods, such as evolutionary multiobjective optimization (EMO) methods, attempt to find a set of Pareto-optimal solutions, instead of a single optimal solution. To evaluate these algorithms for their convergence to the efficient set in multiobjective optimization problems, the current performance metrics require the knowledge of the true Pareto-optimal solutions. In this paper, we develop a theoretically motivated Karush-Kuhn-Tucker proximity measure (KKTPM) that can provide an estimate of the proximity of a set of tradeoff solutions from the true Pareto-optimal solutions without any prior knowledge. Besides theoretical development of the proposed metric, the proposed KKTPM is computed for iteration-wise tradeoff solutions obtained from specific EMO algorithms on two-, three-, five-, and ten-objective optimization problems. Results amply indicate the usefulness of the proposed KKTPM as a metric for evaluating different sets of tradeoff solutions and also as a possible termination criterion for an EMO algorithm. Other possible uses of the proposed metric are also highlighted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deb et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: