Why the study?
Is monitored anaesthesia care safe and effective in elderly patients undergoing diagnostic, therapeutic, and surgical procedures?
Is monitored anaesthesia care safe and effective in elderly patients undergoing diagnostic, therapeutic, and surgical procedures?
Monitored anaesthesia care is a safe and effective method for providing intraoperative care in properly selected elderly patients.
May support monitored anaesthesia care in selected elderly patients; leaves open need for randomized trials to confirm effectiveness.
Background: In elderly patients for some diagnostic, therapeutic and surgical procedure, Monitored anaesthesia care (MAC) may be an anaesthetic option for them. Aim and objective: This prospective study was designed to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of MAC in elderly patients. Method: This study was performed on elderly patients of both sex, age from 50 years and above, scheduled to undergo different therapeutic, diagnostic and surgical procedures. The patients characteristics, pre-anaesthetic problems, anaesthetic techniques, anaesthetic agents, anesthetic time, MAC procedure and complications were assessed. Result: They involved mainly hypertension (26.49%) and diabetes mellitus (21.78%). Almost all procedure was done under sedation (70.38%), local anaesthesia (22.71%) and under only monitoring without sedation or local anaesthesia (6.90%). There were no serious adverse events reported in any patients during MAC. The common complications were arrhythmia (9.60%), vomiting (7.36%) and desaturation (4.56%), hypertension (5.64%). Complications were minor, transient and promptly managed and corrected. MAC duration was ranged from 15 to180 minutes. The mean procedure time was 35.1 + 12.5 minutes. Majority of cases were completed within 30 minutes (51.21%). Conclusion: In properly selected elderly patients, MAC is a safe and effective method of providing intraoperative care for some common diagnostic, therapeutic, and operative procedures. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jbsa.v23i1.18154 Journal of BSA, 2010; 23(1): 19-24
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maruf et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: