Why the study?
Does the NxTAG Respiratory Pathogen Panel and other multiplex assays improve clinical practice in diagnosing respiratory infections?
Does the NxTAG Respiratory Pathogen Panel and other multiplex assays improve clinical practice in diagnosing respiratory infections?
The routine clinical use of multiplex respiratory panels like NxTAG RPP is currently debatable and best reserved for epidemiological surveillance until more data and targeted antiviral therapies become available.
Supports restricting multiplex assays to surveillance; leaves open clinical utility pending better validation and antivirals.
INTRODUCTION: The advent of nucleic acid amplification tests has significantly improved the aetiologic diagnosis of respiratory infections. However, multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) can be technologically challenging. Areas covered: This paper reports the results of the main published studies on the NxTAG Respiratory Pathogen Panel (RPP) and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of extensive use of multiplex assays in clinical practice. Expert commentary: Currently available data seem to indicate that routine use of multiplex assays, including NxTAG RPP Assay, should be recommended only when epidemiological data concerning circulation of viruses and bacteria have to be collected. Their use in clinical practice seems debatable. They have limited sensitivity and specificity at least in the identification of some infectious agents or, as in the case of NxTAG RPP, they have not been evaluated in a sufficient number of patients to allow definitive conclusions. In the future, the clinical relevance of multiplex assays, including NxTAG RPP, could significantly increase, mainly because a number of new antiviral agents effective against several respiratory viruses for which no drug is presently available will be marketed. In addition, it is highly likely that the efficiency of multiplex assays will be significantly improved.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Esposito et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: